A Promising Forest Horror Game Gets Lost in Its Own Bugs

Rating

Video Reviewed
Rating7.6/10
Forest Lookout…

A lonely watchtower, a missing hiker, an increasingly suspicious forest, and a radio connection that may be leading something dangerous directly toward safety give this horror playthrough a strong foundation. The streamer begins expecting the familiar appeal of games built around isolated park rangers, and the early atmosphere largely delivers: a towering lookout, dark trails, unsettling notes, missing-person notices, another distant tower, and a first-night distress call quickly establish that the job is going to become more than watching for fires. What ultimately dominates the experience, however, is not the creature stalking the woods but a progression-breaking bug that forces repeated sections and turns an initially tense rescue into an exercise in troubleshooting.

The setup works particularly well because the game gives the player an ordinary responsibility before introducing the threat. Thomas Wayne arrives as a new forest ranger and learns from coworker Jeff that he is expected to maintain trails, watch for fires, and assist hikers over radio channels posted throughout the forest. Almost immediately, a lost hiker calls from somewhere near a lake and rock formation, forcing the player to interpret a map and direct him toward safety. The streamer initially jokes about ignoring the caller because it is his first day, but soon becomes invested in determining which trail the man is actually on. That transition from reluctant employee to frantic navigator gives the playthrough a simple but effective objective.

The radio-guidance mechanic creates the strongest suspense. Information arrives imperfectly, the hiker encounters closed trails, and strange sounds suggest that something else is moving through the forest. When the electricity fails, the streamer has to leave the relative safety of the lookout and travel to the power building while assuming the hiker may be dying somewhere in the darkness. Later, the caller reports being chased off the trail before finding a cabin, prompting another round of map interpretation. The streamer even entertains the possibility that the creature has already killed the hiker and is imitating his voice, a theory the playthrough raises as speculation rather than something the game has established at that point. The uncertainty is exactly what makes the scenario effective.

Unfortunately, the game repeatedly breaks at the point where that tension should escalate. After guiding the hiker toward a crossroads, dialogue stops progressing, the objective remains active, and the streamer eventually concludes that the game has glitched. Restarting from a checkpoint means replaying the rescue and power-restoration sequence, only for essentially the same problem to occur again. He tries lowering the frame rate to 60 FPS because an unrelated horror game once required that bizarre workaround to climb stairs, then experiments with different routes in hopes that alternate dialogue will bypass the problem. The troubleshooting is funny because of his frustration and his chat's competing advice, but it also consumes a substantial portion of the session.

Those repeated attempts reveal an interesting consequence of broken branching design: the streamer stops thinking primarily about what choice makes sense for the hiker and starts thinking about which choice might avoid the bug. He sends the caller toward different trails, reaches an empty tower outcome, debates whether the North Tower route could work, and eventually puts his faith in a specific chat member's recommendation. The resulting failures become running jokes, particularly when he threatens the unlucky adviser with an unpleasant mailbox delivery. The community interaction keeps the replayed material entertaining, but the underlying problem is severe. A horror game dependent on immersion cannot repeatedly send the player backward through lengthy dialogue and navigation without draining much of the fear from the scenario.

The stream itself also wanders considerably beyond the game. Early on, a carbonated drink overflowing causes the introduction to be replayed multiple times, and later the bug reminds the streamer of another horror game where changing the frame rate mysteriously fixed an impassable staircase. He pauses the current playthrough to search for that older video and revisit the clip with chat before returning to the forest. These detours fit the loose atmosphere of a livestream and produce some entertaining reactions, but they make the video much less focused as a horror experience. The game's own repetition compounds the issue, so stretches that should be building toward a confrontation instead become conversations about old streams, frame rates, advertisements, chat advice, and whether anyone can locate a walkthrough.

The eventual solution is especially unsatisfying because the streamer appears to rely on the only available gameplay video to see what happens rather than naturally reaching the ending himself. The ending shown involves the hiker dying, obtaining a key, entering a tunnel, detonating explosives, and dying, which leaves the streamer unimpressed after so much effort spent trying to preserve the caller. His reaction that the ending is weak is understandable within the experience shown, although the bugs make it difficult to judge how effective the finale might have felt after an uninterrupted playthrough. By the time the outcome is revealed, the rescue scenario has been repeated enough that its emotional and horror payoff has largely disappeared.

What saves the session is the streamer's continued enthusiasm for the concept despite everything going wrong. He repeatedly praises the game while criticizing its technical state, compares the setup favorably with other forest-watch horror games, and insists that it had substantial potential even after multiple progression failures. That distinction is important. The isolated setting, map navigation, radio communication, power outage, unseen pursuer, and possibility that the voice on the radio cannot be trusted all provide ingredients for an effective short horror experience. The problem is execution: when the player spends more time trying to determine whether the monster, the hiker, or the game's scripting has caused the silence, technical failure becomes the scariest thing in the forest.

Pros

  • The isolated lookout tower and nighttime forest provide an immediately effective horror setting, reinforced by missing-person notices, strange notes, distant structures, and unsettling sounds.
  • Guiding a lost hiker through a map using incomplete radio descriptions creates a strong interactive premise that requires observation rather than simply following objectives.
  • Leaving the tower to restore power effectively removes the player's sense of safety while the hiker's situation continues to deteriorate elsewhere.
  • Uncertainty surrounding the pursuing creature and the identity of the voice on the radio gives the streamer room to develop entertaining theories about what may actually be happening.
  • The streamer's reactions and ongoing exchanges with chat keep repeated sections amusing even after the game's horror momentum has been badly damaged.
  • Despite the technical problems, the playthrough clearly communicates why the underlying forest-ranger concept remains appealing.

Cons

  • A progression-breaking dialogue bug appears repeatedly and forces lengthy portions of the hiker rescue to be replayed, severely damaging pacing and immersion.
  • Repeated attempts to bypass the problem turn meaningful navigation decisions into guesses about which route might avoid broken scripting.
  • Long tangents involving an overflowing drink, an older horror-game bug, searching for a previous video, and chat discussions make an already disrupted playthrough even less focused.
  • The eventual ending is discovered through another gameplay video rather than earned through the streamer's own successful playthrough, weakening the final payoff.
  • After building considerable suspense around rescuing the hiker, the revealed ending feels abrupt and unrewarding to the streamer, particularly given how much repetition was required just to reach it indirectly.

The session captures both the appeal and frustration of discovering an ambitious but unstable indie horror game: its lonely watchtower, radio rescue, branching trails, power failure, and unseen threat repeatedly create genuine tension, only for technical problems to dismantle that tension at critical moments. The streamer's improvisation and chat interaction turn the failures into comedy, but no amount of entertaining troubleshooting can fully compensate for having to replay large sections and ultimately watch someone else reach the conclusion. There is a genuinely promising forest horror concept underneath the bugs, which makes the experience's collapse more disappointing than a game that simply had little to offer in the first place.

Recent Reviews