The episode revolves around putting a wide variety of Murder Mystery 2 glitches and exploits to the test rather than simply listing them. Instead of assuming every trick still functions, the host repeatedly checks which ones remain usable after recent patches, often failing several attempts before finally succeeding. That trial-and-error approach makes the demonstrations feel more authentic, while the fast-paced commentary keeps the focus on experimentation instead of presenting every exploit as guaranteed.
A major strength is how the video distinguishes between newly discovered tricks and older glitches that have persisted for years. Wall clipping, hiding spots, out-of-bounds areas, underwater movement, and bomb-jump techniques are each revisited with commentary on whether they appear to have been patched or still work. Although these observations are based on the creator's own gameplay rather than official developer information, the side-by-side testing gives viewers a practical sense of the game's current state.
The presentation remains energetic throughout, with frequent reactions to unexpected successes and failures. Rather than editing out unsuccessful attempts, the creator leaves many of them in, reinforcing that several glitches require precise timing or repeated tries. This also tempers expectations, making it clear that reproducing these exploits consistently can be difficult despite their apparent effectiveness.
Later sections broaden the scope beyond map glitches by examining exploits involving wall penetration, knife throws through scenery, and a connection-based teleport effect achieved by briefly disabling Wi-Fi on mobile. The creator demonstrates the behavior from multiple perspectives and treats it as a serious gameplay problem rather than a feature. While the demonstrations illustrate what occurred during testing, they should be understood as observations from the video rather than confirmation of how every server or future version of the game will behave.
The public-server segment adds entertainment by showing live player reactions after the glitches are used in actual matches. Arguments over whether the creator is hacking, combined with humorous exchanges in chat, provide some memorable moments without requiring elaborate editing. At the same time, these sequences occupy a substantial portion of the runtime and gradually shift attention away from testing new mechanics toward reaction-based comedy.
The closing commentary gives the video a somewhat more balanced perspective by acknowledging that many of the showcased exploits are already widely known and encouraging viewers not to abuse them against ordinary players. That doesn't eliminate the ethical concerns surrounding exploit demonstrations, but it does frame the content as a survey of the game's current vulnerabilities rather than an attempt to portray cheating as normal gameplay. Overall, the combination of hands-on testing, humor, and commentary makes for an engaging look at the state of Murder Mystery 2, even if some segments become repetitive.
Pros
- Tests a wide variety of glitches instead of assuming they all still function, including showing failed attempts.
- Clearly distinguishes between newly discovered exploits, long-standing glitches, and mechanics that appear to have been patched.
- Maintains an energetic, humorous presentation that keeps repetitive testing entertaining.
- Public-server demonstrations effectively illustrate how some exploits affect actual gameplay and player reactions.
Cons
- Later sections spend considerable time on chat reactions and trolling, reducing the focus on discovering new glitches.
- Several demonstrations require repeated attempts, which occasionally slows the pacing.
- Showcases exploit techniques that could encourage misuse despite the creator's advice to use them responsibly.
This is an entertaining mix of glitch testing and live gameplay that succeeds because it actively verifies what still works instead of relying on outdated information. The creator's enthusiasm and willingness to include failed attempts make the demonstrations feel more credible, while the reaction segments add humor even if they sometimes overshadow the technical focus.
