Recording Absurd Animal Voices Turns a Tiny Zoo Into an Accidental Soundboard

Rating

Video Reviewed
Rating8.5/10
We Built A Zoo

A simple zoo-building game becomes increasingly chaotic once Courtney and Angela realize that every animal can be given a custom recorded sound. Their original goal is straightforward: build a zoo, name its residents, record voices for them, and eventually surprise Trevor with a tour of what they created. The game's modest management systems quickly become secondary to improvisation as normal animal noises give way to strange phrases, impressions, references, and names such as Obama the sheep, Dirt the goat, Fortnite the flamingo, Podcast the walrus, Issues the gorilla, and That's Lunch the panda. What could have been a repetitive novelty game works largely because the pair keep discovering increasingly ridiculous ways to misuse its central mechanic, culminating in Trevor walking through a zoo that has effectively become a personalized audio collage.

The early minutes establish that progression especially well because Courtney and Angela do not begin at maximum absurdity. Chris the duck receives something resembling an actual duck sound, and they initially spend time learning how animals are purchased, placed, and restricted to different habitats. The “first take, best take” rule soon gives the recordings their defining spontaneity, since mistakes, laughter, awkward delivery, and accidental additions remain attached to the animals rather than being polished away. As they become more comfortable with the mechanic, names increasingly exist to inspire sounds rather than describe animals, and the zoo develops its own nonsensical internal logic.

Dirt provides the clearest early breakthrough. Giving a goat the recurring flirtatious line about coming over for a kiss immediately demonstrates how funny repeated custom audio can become when an animal is encountered throughout the zoo. Tonya Harding becomes even more relentless, repeatedly threatening Nancy Kerrigan whenever the players approach, while Doctor preserves a recording mistake specifically because its failure makes it funnier. Other animals function as miniature jokes: Fortnite announces a victory royale, Vegas Baby evokes gambling, Issues asks for a bathroom code, and That's Lunch becomes a repeated “we're back” gag. None of these ideas is particularly elaborate alone, but hearing them collide as animals stand near one another gradually turns navigation itself into part of the comedy.

Courtney and Angela's chemistry is more important than the game design. They rapidly pitch names, reject ideas, accidentally improve each other's suggestions, and commit to whatever strange association appears first. Angela's enthusiasm for naming animals becomes a running engine for the episode, while Courtney frequently pushes the recordings toward impressions or references that have almost nothing to do with the creature involved. Their amusement feels genuine enough that even moments spent repositioning animals or waiting for currency remain lively. The funniest developments often come from discovering something unintentionally irritating and then embracing it, particularly their growing exasperation with recordings that play repeatedly whenever they enter an animal's range.

Building specifically for Trevor gives the otherwise aimless experimentation a useful destination. They import a recording of his voice for Baller, later create Cigar as a father figure telling Trevor he is proud of him, and discuss arranging animals so that he will encounter particular sounds during the eventual tour. The personalization becomes more pronounced as Ian and Anthony are represented through animals and recordings, turning the zoo into a collection of Smosh references alongside the completely arbitrary jokes. This prevents the episode from being merely a sequence of custom voice clips because viewers know someone who has not seen the construction process will eventually have to interpret the finished result.

The gameplay itself is intentionally shallow in the presentation. Coins accumulate as animals make sounds, new creatures become progressively more expensive, different species occupy separate biomes, decorations or features can be purchased, and animals can eventually be placed together to perform their recordings sequentially. Those mechanics provide just enough structure to pace the improvisation, but there is little interest in zoo design, optimization, progression strategy, or exploring everything the game offers. At one point the players effectively acknowledge that they are creating a soundboard, which accurately describes where the episode's focus has gone. Viewers interested in understanding the game receive its central gimmick and basic systems, but comedy consistently takes precedence over demonstrating its broader possibilities.

That narrow focus creates repetition as the episode continues. Buying an animal, inventing a bizarre name, recording a phrase, placing it, earning money, and repeating the process remains the dominant loop for most of the runtime. Some animals receive memorable identities while others feel like another variation on the same joke, and recurring clips such as Tonya Harding's become deliberately exhausting. The Opera sponsorship also arrives very early, shortly after the first animal, interrupting the initial discovery of the premise before the comedy has fully developed. The hosts' energy carries these stretches, but a tighter selection of animals could have preserved the escalation without requiring quite so many repetitions of the same setup.

Trevor's arrival provides the payoff the format needs. Courtney becomes the tour guide while he listens to recordings without having witnessed how any of them were created, allowing familiar jokes to become strange again through his confusion. He quickly understands that they have recorded sounds for every animal, recognizes his own voice in Baller, encounters the Ian and Anthony references, and gravitates toward recurring favorites such as Dirt and Prom. The chorus feature then turns selected animals into a deliberately overwhelming sequence, making the accumulated recordings feel like something they were building toward rather than a collection that simply ends. Letting Trevor create Cordial as the final animal also gives him a small role in the zoo rather than leaving him entirely as an observer.

Pros

  • The custom-voice mechanic is exploited far beyond straightforward animal impressions, turning each new creature into an improvisational comedy prompt.
  • Courtney and Angela's “first take, best take” rule preserves mistakes and awkward deliveries that frequently become funnier than a polished recording would have been.
  • Recurring animals such as Dirt and Tonya Harding become effective running jokes because their recordings repeatedly intrude while the players explore the zoo.
  • Naming animals specifically to inspire their voices creates a steady stream of absurd combinations rather than relying on one type of joke throughout.
  • Building the zoo for Trevor gives the loose gameplay a clear endpoint and makes his confused tour a satisfying payoff to the earlier setup.
  • Baller, Cigar, Ian, Anthony, and other personalized additions gradually transform the zoo into a collection of Smosh references alongside the unrelated absurdity.
  • The chorus mechanic provides a fitting final escalation by allowing several established recordings to collide intentionally.

Cons

  • The repeated cycle of purchasing, naming, recording, placing, and revisiting animals becomes structurally repetitive despite the variety of jokes.
  • Several recordings are intentionally played so often that the irritation becomes part of the humor, particularly the recurring Tonya Harding line.
  • Zoo management and progression remain largely unexplored, so the game eventually functions more as a custom soundboard than a building or management experience.
  • Some later animals receive less distinctive concepts as the cast tries to maintain the rapid pace of names and recordings.
  • The sponsorship interrupts the episode shortly after the premise is introduced, delaying the early momentum before the zoo has developed its comedic identity.

The game supplies little more than animals, money, habitats, and a microphone, but Courtney and Angela turn that simplicity into an effective improvisational playground by treating every creature as an excuse to create another inexplicable voice clip. The construction loop eventually becomes repetitive and the actual zoo-management systems barely matter, yet the escalating soundboard, recurring animal jokes, personalized Smosh references, and Trevor's bewildered tour give the experiment a strong comic payoff that justifies the deliberately chaotic build.

Related Reviews

Discover more from Phil's Video Reviews

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading