Samsung’s Smaller Foldable Steals the Spotlight From the Ultra

Rating

Video Reviewed
Rating8.6/10
Z Fold 8 | Z Fold 8 Ultra – HANDS ON!

The most persuasive part of this hands-on is not the promise of a thinner flagship but the presenter's reaction to Samsung's smaller foldable. The new Fold 8 is described as shorter, wider, lighter, and closer to a passport-shaped device, and that change appears to matter more in actual handling than the Fold 8 Ultra becoming thinner. The presenter repeatedly prefers the smaller model for typing, reading, scrolling, and general comfort, while admitting that the Ultra's reduced thickness is difficult to notice and the upgraded magnetic hinge feels essentially unchanged. That willingness to distinguish meaningful improvements from specifications that sound better on paper gives the early design discussion useful credibility.

The display changes follow a similar pattern of measurable improvement without pretending Samsung has solved every foldable compromise. Both models are said to use a new titanium alloy film and plate intended to reduce the crease, and the presenter sees an improvement while acknowledging that the crease remains visible. Brightness rises to a claimed 3,000 nits, while a new anti-reflective finish produces a difference she finds relatively minor in person. More disappointing to her is the absence of a privacy display, particularly on a device now carrying the Ultra name. The repeated comparison with the S26 Ultra becomes important throughout the video because Samsung's naming encourages expectations that the Fold 8 Ultra does not consistently meet.

Battery improvements are among the most substantial claimed upgrades. The presenter says Samsung has moved to silicon-carbon batteries, allowing the Fold 8 Ultra to increase from 4,400 mAh to 5,000 mAh while the smaller Fold 8 carries a 4,800 mAh battery. She reports expected use of around 27 and 26 hours respectively and says both models now support 45-watt wired and 20-watt wireless charging, with a 0-to-60-percent charge taking under 30 minutes. Those specifications make the battery section encouraging, but this is still a hands-on presentation rather than a battery test, so the runtime and charging claims are reported expectations rather than independently demonstrated results. The continued absence of magnetic charging also stands out given the premium positioning.

The cameras expose the awkwardness of the Ultra branding more clearly. The Fold 8 Ultra receives a 200-megapixel main camera and upgraded 50-megapixel ultrawide but retains a 10-megapixel telephoto, while the smaller Fold 8 is described as having 50-megapixel main and ultrawide cameras without a dedicated telephoto. The presenter is understandably disappointed that the Fold 8 Ultra does not inherit the S26 Ultra's 50-megapixel telephoto and repeatedly asks what "Ultra" means when several flagship features remain absent. More positively, both foldables include features such as horizon locking, simultaneous front-and-rear video, log recording, cinematic LUT support, and a subject-following reframing tool called Fancam. These demonstrations make the camera discussion more useful than a simple specification comparison, even though there is not enough image testing here to judge overall camera quality.

Software receives considerable attention through One UI 9 and Gemini integration. On-screen awareness is demonstrated through a hotel-search example in which Gemini interprets the current screen, finds accommodation, and leaves choices such as price and confirmation to the user. Gemini notebooks can organize mixed files and notes, while contextual suggestions inside messages can surface actions such as checking the calendar. The video also demonstrates generative photo editing and a document scanner designed to remove fingers, bends, corners, and stains from captured pages. These features help explain how the larger folding display might be useful beyond simply providing more screen space, although the brief demonstrations do not establish how reliably the tools perform across everyday situations.

The comparison between the two models ultimately produces a slightly unexpected conclusion: the cheaper Fold 8 sounds like the more exciting product. The Ultra has advantages in size, thinness, main-camera resolution, and telephoto capability, but the presenter consistently returns to the smaller model's weight, proportions, brighter color choices, and comfortable handling. At £1,699 it is hardly inexpensive, while the Fold 8 Ultra reaches £1,899, yet the presentation never establishes a compelling reason why most buyers should spend the additional £200. The missing S Pen support on both devices further complicates the premium proposition, especially because the Fold's large internal display would seem naturally suited to stylus use.

As a hands-on preview, the video is energetic, visually oriented, and unusually clear about which changes actually made an impression during limited use. The presenter's enthusiasm for the smaller Fold 8 feels earned because it emerges from handling and usability rather than simply repeating Samsung's feature list, and criticisms of the hinge, anti-reflective treatment, cameras, charging, privacy display, S Pen support, and price prevent the coverage from becoming promotional. Its limitation is equally clear: many claims about battery life, charging, durability of the improved crease, processing performance, and software usefulness cannot be meaningfully evaluated during a short encounter. Waiting for deeper testing—and for the competing foldable the presenter mentions at the end—makes more sense than treating these first impressions as a final buying verdict.

Pros

  • The comparison clearly explains why the smaller Fold 8's proportions and lighter body may matter more in daily use than another incremental reduction in Ultra thickness.
  • The presenter openly acknowledges improvements that seem minor in person, including the magnetic hinge and anti-reflective finish, rather than exaggerating every change.
  • Battery capacity, charging, displays, cameras, software tools, and pricing receive enough attention to provide a useful overview of the differences between the two models.
  • Camera and software features such as horizon locking, dual recording, Fancam, generative editing, Gemini integration, and document scanning are demonstrated through practical examples.
  • Repeated comparisons with the S26 Ultra raise a legitimate question about what buyers should expect from Samsung's new Fold 8 Ultra branding.

Cons

  • Battery-life, charging, crease durability, and performance claims are presented without the extended testing necessary to verify them in real-world use.
  • Camera coverage focuses heavily on specifications and features without enough sample evaluation to determine whether image quality has meaningfully improved.
  • The video identifies several omissions from the Fold 8 Ultra but never establishes a strong practical case for paying £200 more than the smaller model.
  • The absence of S Pen support, magnetic charging, a privacy display, and some S26 Ultra-level hardware makes the Ultra designation feel difficult to justify based on the features presented.

The smaller Fold 8 emerges as the surprise winner of this hands-on because its lighter, wider design appears to improve everyday usability more noticeably than the Ultra's incremental hardware advantages. Samsung's battery, display, camera, and software updates make both models promising, but high prices and several conspicuous omissions—especially on the Ultra—mean the strongest reasons to upgrade will depend on whether these positive first impressions survive full testing.

Discover more from Phil's Video Reviews

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading